Should the frontier slow down

A July evaluation accident grew into an industry-wide argument about pace, and then into a number everyone had to answer for.

Spans 2026-07-21 – 2026-09-12 Episodes 3

Where things stand

By mid-September, three long-standing competitors had each said, in the same week, that the pace should slow down, and a number that had never actually been calculated became the question everyone was forced to answer.

The sequence turned out to run further back than the coverage did: 1,134 lab employees asked for pacing in July, and OpenAI's chief scientist conceded the alignment point six days before Amodei's essay. As of September 17th the argument has a second axis. Nobody disputes that evaluation cannot keep up with models that work over month-long horizons; what is now open is who ends up holding the capability if external releases slow while internal work does not.

Timeline

  1. 2026-07-21 The OpenAI–Hugging Face Attack OpenAI / Hugging Face
  2. 2026-07-28 Pacing the Frontier Frontier lab employees
  3. 2026-08-04 The Test That Reached Real People UK AI Security Institute
  4. 2026-09-01 The Incident, Reproduced On Purpose Anthropic
  5. 2026-09-06 An Alien Mind OpenAI
  6. 2026-09-12 We Must Pace the Frontier Anthropic

Episodes

  1. 2026-09-19 The cost nobody priced
  2. 2026-09-18 Who said it first
  3. 2026-09-15 That 10%, and an argument that never met

People

Theme
Language
Support
© funclosure 2025